Expected Discharge Score
Every resident has a story, and the expected discharge score reflects one way CMS understands that story. Choose a resident below to see how their starting point, prior level, and current reality shape the model's prediction.
Choose a resident
Margaret is the baseline case the model is built around.
Starting Point —A common orthopedic case on a well-understood recovery path. +28.2 pts
Prior Level —Used a walker and needed some assistance before admission. 0.0 pts
Current Reality —No active clinical factors and no coded comorbidities. 0.0 pts
starting-point dominant — the baseline carries the score.
Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis
What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?
CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.
Margaret's admission score combined with her primary diagnosis of Hip & Knee Replacement sets her starting estimated discharge score.
This reflects where similar residents tend to land. It is the typical outcome for this type of case before anything unique about Margaret is considered.
- Model Intercept (+29.08 pts)
- Baseline Admission Lift (+16.25 pts)
- Diminishing Returns (-2.14 pts)
- Hip & Knee Replacement (reference) (+0.00 pts)
- Admission × Diagnosis Interaction (+0.00 pts)
Pre-Admission Profile
How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?
Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. Residents who needed significant help with mobility or relied on assistive devices are unlikely to become fully independent during a short SNF stay, while those who were more independent may have greater recovery potential depending on diagnosis.
In Margaret's case, her pre-admission profile barely moves the needle. Prior surgery, walker use, and prior stair assistance each contribute small positive adjustments, while needing some help with mobility before admission contributes a small negative one — together, they roughly cancel out.
- Age: 65–74 years (reference) (+0.00 pts)
- Prior Surgery (+0.65 pts)
- Prior Indoor Mobility: Some Help (-1.08 pts)
- Prior Stairs: Some Help (+0.34 pts)
- Mobility Device: Walker (+0.11 pts)
View 5 inactive covariates in this category
- Prior Self-Care: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.03 pts)
- Prior Functional Cognition: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -0.93 pts)
- Mobility Device: Manual/Motorized Wheelchair or Scooter (0.00 of potential -2.57 pts)
- Mobility Device: Mechanical Lift (0.00 of potential -2.82 pts)
- Mobility Device: Orthotics/Prosthetics (0.00 of potential +0.03 pts)
Clinical Factors & Comorbidities
What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?
This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.
Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and day-to-day progress.
Margaret has no active clinical flags at admission.
- Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (0.00 of potential -1.02 pts)
- Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
- Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (0.00 of potential -1.02 pts)
- Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
- Cognitive Function (BIMS): Intact (reference) (0.00 of potential -2.47 pts)
- Communication: No Impairment (reference) (0.00 of potential -1.43 pts)
- Urinary Continence: Continent (reference) (0.00 of potential -2.34 pts)
- Bowel Continence: Continent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.07 pts)
- History of Falls (0.00 of potential +0.27 pts)
- Tube / IV / Parenteral Feed (0.00 of potential -1.05 pts)
- Mechanically Altered Diet (0.00 of potential -0.78 pts)
- High BMI (0.00 of potential -1.86 pts)
- Low BMI (0.00 of potential -0.33 pts)
- No PT/OT During Stay (0.00 of potential -3.09 pts)
Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.
Margaret has no HCC-coded comorbidities.
- Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
- Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
- Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
- Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
- Lymphoma & Other Cancers (HCC10) (0.00 of potential -0.86 pts)
- Colorectal / Bladder Cancer (HCC11) (0.00 of potential -0.03 pts)
- Diabetes (HCC18 / HCC19) (0.00 of potential -0.12 pts)
- Other Endocrine / Metabolic Disorders (HCC23) (0.00 of potential +0.06 pts)
- Intestinal Obstruction / Perforation (HCC33) (0.00 of potential +0.51 pts)
- Dementia (HCC51 / HCC52) (0.00 of potential -1.00 pts)
- Mental Health Disorders (HCC57–60) (0.00 of potential -0.15 pts)
- Tetraplegia (partial) / Paraplegia (HCC70 / HCC71) (0.00 of potential -2.22 pts)
- Multiple Sclerosis (HCC77) (0.00 of potential -1.11 pts)
- Parkinson's & Huntington's Diseases (HCC78) (0.00 of potential -0.50 pts)
- Angina Pectoris (HCC88) (0.00 of potential -0.01 pts)
- Hemiplegia / Hemiparesis (HCC103) (0.00 of potential -1.80 pts)
- Aspiration / Bacterial Pneumonia (HCC114 / HCC115) (0.00 of potential +0.13 pts)
- Dialysis / CKD Stage 5 (HCC134 / HCC136) (0.00 of potential -1.51 pts)
- CKD Stages 1–4 (HCC137–HCC139) (0.00 of potential -0.20 pts)
- Major Head Injury (HCC167) (0.00 of potential -0.34 pts)
- Amputations (HCC173 / HCC189) (0.00 of potential +0.46 pts)
CMS expects Margaret's discharge score to be carried almost entirely by where she starts. Her admission score and orthopedic diagnosis place her on a recovery path with strong typical outcomes, and her pre-admission profile is essentially neutral — prior surgery, walker use, and prior stair assistance offset her mild prior mobility limitation. With no active clinical concerns and no coded comorbidities, the model has nothing else to add or subtract.
This is a starting-point dominant pattern: the headline number is the diagnostic baseline, and the rest of the model confirms there's nothing meaningful in the way.
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.
James represents a harder recovery path, shaped early by diagnosis and reduced further by resident-specific factors.
Starting Point —Stroke with low admission mobility — already on a conservative recovery path. +22.5 pts
Prior Level —Prior dependence and cognitive limitations meaningfully lower expectations. -8.9 pts
Current Reality —Active clinical factors plus a coded comorbidity continue to reduce recovery. -4.8 pts
a conservative starting estimate, with multiple factors continuing to pull it down.
Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis
What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?
CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.
James's admission score combined with his primary diagnosis of Stroke sets his starting estimated discharge score.
This is lower because stroke recovery often follows a different trajectory, with more variability and typically smaller functional gains.
- Model Intercept (+29.08 pts)
- Baseline Admission Lift (+13.00 pts)
- Diminishing Returns (-1.37 pts)
- Stroke (-8.62 pts)
- Admission × Diagnosis Interaction (+2.40 pts)
Pre-Admission Profile
How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?
Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. Even if the starting estimate is moderate, prior limitations can significantly lower the expected outcome.
James's pre-admission factors meaningfully reduce the expectation. Prior dependence in self-care, mobility, and cognition combined with wheelchair use all pull the expectation down; only prior stair dependence offsets that with a small positive contribution.
- Age: 65–74 years (reference) (+0.00 pts)
- Prior Self-Care: Dependent (-4.03 pts)
- Prior Indoor Mobility: Dependent (-1.72 pts)
- Prior Stairs: Dependent (+0.32 pts)
- Prior Functional Cognition: Limited (-0.93 pts)
- Mobility Device: Manual/Motorized Wheelchair or Scooter (-2.57 pts)
View 4 inactive covariates in this category
- Prior Surgery (0.00 of potential +0.65 pts)
- Mobility Device: Walker (0.00 of potential +0.11 pts)
- Mobility Device: Mechanical Lift (0.00 of potential -2.82 pts)
- Mobility Device: Orthotics/Prosthetics (0.00 of potential +0.03 pts)
Clinical Factors & Comorbidities
What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?
This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.
Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and progress.
James presents with cognitive impairment, communication deficits, and urinary incontinence, all reducing expected progress.
- Cognitive Function (BIMS): Moderately Impaired (-1.13 pts)
- Communication: Mild (-0.62 pts)
- Urinary Continence: Occasionally / Frequently / Always Incontinent (-1.21 pts)
View 9 inactive covariates in this category
- Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (0.00 of potential -1.02 pts)
- Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
- Bowel Continence: Continent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.07 pts)
- History of Falls (0.00 of potential +0.27 pts)
- Tube / IV / Parenteral Feed (0.00 of potential -1.05 pts)
- Mechanically Altered Diet (0.00 of potential -0.78 pts)
- High BMI (0.00 of potential -1.86 pts)
- Low BMI (0.00 of potential -0.33 pts)
- No PT/OT During Stay (0.00 of potential -3.09 pts)
Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.
James has hemiplegia/hemiparesis, which further reduces the expectation.
- Hemiplegia / Hemiparesis (HCC103) (-1.80 pts)
View 18 inactive covariates in this category
- Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
- Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
- Lymphoma & Other Cancers (HCC10) (0.00 of potential -0.86 pts)
- Colorectal / Bladder Cancer (HCC11) (0.00 of potential -0.03 pts)
- Diabetes (HCC18 / HCC19) (0.00 of potential -0.12 pts)
- Other Endocrine / Metabolic Disorders (HCC23) (0.00 of potential +0.06 pts)
- Intestinal Obstruction / Perforation (HCC33) (0.00 of potential +0.51 pts)
- Dementia (HCC51 / HCC52) (0.00 of potential -1.00 pts)
- Mental Health Disorders (HCC57–60) (0.00 of potential -0.15 pts)
- Tetraplegia (partial) / Paraplegia (HCC70 / HCC71) (0.00 of potential -2.22 pts)
- Multiple Sclerosis (HCC77) (0.00 of potential -1.11 pts)
- Parkinson's & Huntington's Diseases (HCC78) (0.00 of potential -0.50 pts)
- Angina Pectoris (HCC88) (0.00 of potential -0.01 pts)
- Aspiration / Bacterial Pneumonia (HCC114 / HCC115) (0.00 of potential +0.13 pts)
- Dialysis / CKD Stage 5 (HCC134 / HCC136) (0.00 of potential -1.51 pts)
- CKD Stages 1–4 (HCC137–HCC139) (0.00 of potential -0.20 pts)
- Major Head Injury (HCC167) (0.00 of potential -0.34 pts)
- Amputations (HCC173 / HCC189) (0.00 of potential +0.46 pts)
The Stroke diagnosis already places James on a conservative recovery path, and three resident-specific layers compound from there: prior dependence and cognitive limits, active clinical issues (cognition, communication, urinary incontinence), and hemiplegia.
This is a harder recovery path: every layer pulls in the same direction. The model expects modest improvement during the stay rather than a meaningful return to independence.
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.
Ruth represents a stacked-constraint case where every layer works to lower expectations.
Starting Point —Debility and cardiorespiratory diagnosis with low admission mobility — recovery path is already limited. +24.0 pts
Prior Level —Mechanical lift, dependent mobility, cognitive limitations, advanced age. -10.0 pts
Current Reality —Multiple active clinical factors and a coded comorbidity further reduce expectations. -10.9 pts
all three layers stack to push expectations down.
Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis
What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?
CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.
Ruth's admission score combined with her primary diagnosis of Debility & Cardiorespiratory sets her starting estimated discharge score.
This reflects a more limited recovery trajectory compared to more predictable rehab pathways.
- Model Intercept (+29.08 pts)
- Baseline Admission Lift (+15.17 pts)
- Diminishing Returns (-1.86 pts)
- Debility & Cardiorespiratory (-6.24 pts)
- Admission × Diagnosis Interaction (+1.85 pts)
Pre-Admission Profile
How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?
Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. When prior function shows high dependence, the expected outcome is lowered further.
Ruth's pre-admission factors meaningfully reduce the expectation. Mechanical lift use, dependent self-care and mobility, cognitive limitations, and advanced age all pull the score down; prior stair dependence offsets that slightly with a small positive contribution.
- Age: 85–90 years (-0.78 pts)
- Prior Self-Care: Dependent (-4.03 pts)
- Prior Indoor Mobility: Dependent (-1.72 pts)
- Prior Stairs: Dependent (+0.32 pts)
- Prior Functional Cognition: Limited (-0.93 pts)
- Mobility Device: Mechanical Lift (-2.82 pts)
View 4 inactive covariates in this category
- Prior Surgery (0.00 of potential +0.65 pts)
- Mobility Device: Walker (0.00 of potential +0.11 pts)
- Mobility Device: Manual/Motorized Wheelchair or Scooter (0.00 of potential -2.57 pts)
- Mobility Device: Orthotics/Prosthetics (0.00 of potential +0.03 pts)
Clinical Factors & Comorbidities
What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?
This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.
Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and progress.
Ruth presents with severe cognitive impairment, bowel and urinary incontinence, communication limitations, and a pressure ulcer — all reducing expected progress. Her history of falls actually contributes a small positive offset.
- Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (-1.02 pts)
- Cognitive Function (BIMS): Severely Impaired (-2.47 pts)
- Communication: Moderate–Severe (-1.43 pts)
- Urinary Continence: Occasionally / Frequently / Always Incontinent (-1.21 pts)
- Bowel Continence: Always Incontinent (-4.07 pts)
- History of Falls (+0.27 pts)
View 6 inactive covariates in this category
- Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
- Tube / IV / Parenteral Feed (0.00 of potential -1.05 pts)
- Mechanically Altered Diet (0.00 of potential -0.78 pts)
- High BMI (0.00 of potential -1.86 pts)
- Low BMI (0.00 of potential -0.33 pts)
- No PT/OT During Stay (0.00 of potential -3.09 pts)
Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.
Ruth has dementia, which further reduces the expectation.
- Dementia (HCC51 / HCC52) (-1.00 pts)
View 18 inactive covariates in this category
- Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
- Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
- Lymphoma & Other Cancers (HCC10) (0.00 of potential -0.86 pts)
- Colorectal / Bladder Cancer (HCC11) (0.00 of potential -0.03 pts)
- Diabetes (HCC18 / HCC19) (0.00 of potential -0.12 pts)
- Other Endocrine / Metabolic Disorders (HCC23) (0.00 of potential +0.06 pts)
- Intestinal Obstruction / Perforation (HCC33) (0.00 of potential +0.51 pts)
- Mental Health Disorders (HCC57–60) (0.00 of potential -0.15 pts)
- Tetraplegia (partial) / Paraplegia (HCC70 / HCC71) (0.00 of potential -2.22 pts)
- Multiple Sclerosis (HCC77) (0.00 of potential -1.11 pts)
- Parkinson's & Huntington's Diseases (HCC78) (0.00 of potential -0.50 pts)
- Angina Pectoris (HCC88) (0.00 of potential -0.01 pts)
- Hemiplegia / Hemiparesis (HCC103) (0.00 of potential -1.80 pts)
- Aspiration / Bacterial Pneumonia (HCC114 / HCC115) (0.00 of potential +0.13 pts)
- Dialysis / CKD Stage 5 (HCC134 / HCC136) (0.00 of potential -1.51 pts)
- CKD Stages 1–4 (HCC137–HCC139) (0.00 of potential -0.20 pts)
- Major Head Injury (HCC167) (0.00 of potential -0.34 pts)
- Amputations (HCC173 / HCC189) (0.00 of potential +0.46 pts)
Ruth's debility and cardiorespiratory diagnosis paired with a low admission score places her on an already-limited trajectory, and every other layer continues to pull from there: prior dependence and advanced age, severe cognitive and continence concerns plus a pressure ulcer, and dementia. Her history of falls adds a small offsetting positive that doesn't change the overall pattern.
This is a stacked-constraint pattern: nearly every covariate reduces expectations simultaneously. The model is predicting limited functional change.
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.
Robert represents a strong-start case: the baseline is high, but multiple smaller factors refine it downward.
Starting Point —Fracture with strong admission mobility — meaningful gains expected. +25.5 pts
Prior Level —Some prior assistance, walker use, moderate age. -0.6 pts
Current Reality —History of falls; dementia and mental health conditions. -0.9 pts
strong start, refined downward — no single dominant factor.
Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis
What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?
CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.
Robert's admission score combined with his primary diagnosis of Fractures & Multiple Trauma sets his starting estimated discharge score.
This reflects a recovery path where higher functional gains are commonly expected.
- Model Intercept (+29.08 pts)
- Baseline Admission Lift (+21.67 pts)
- Diminishing Returns (-3.80 pts)
- Fractures & Multiple Trauma (-1.80 pts)
- Admission × Diagnosis Interaction (+0.40 pts)
Pre-Admission Profile
How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?
Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. When limitations are present but not severe, they create modest adjustments.
Robert's pre-admission factors create modest adjustments in both directions. Prior assistance with self-care and mobility, plus age, pull the expectation down; prior surgery and walker use offset that with small positive contributions, leaving only a small net reduction.
- Age: 75–84 years (-0.31 pts)
- Prior Surgery (+0.65 pts)
- Prior Indoor Mobility: Some Help (-1.08 pts)
- Mobility Device: Walker (+0.11 pts)
View 6 inactive covariates in this category
- Prior Self-Care: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.03 pts)
- Prior Stairs: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential +0.34 pts)
- Prior Functional Cognition: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -0.93 pts)
- Mobility Device: Manual/Motorized Wheelchair or Scooter (0.00 of potential -2.57 pts)
- Mobility Device: Mechanical Lift (0.00 of potential -2.82 pts)
- Mobility Device: Orthotics/Prosthetics (0.00 of potential +0.03 pts)
Clinical Factors & Comorbidities
What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?
This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.
Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and progress.
Robert has a history of falls, which the model actually treats as a small positive contributor.
- History of Falls (+0.27 pts)
View 11 inactive covariates in this category
- Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (0.00 of potential -1.02 pts)
- Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
- Cognitive Function (BIMS): Intact (reference) (0.00 of potential -2.47 pts)
- Communication: No Impairment (reference) (0.00 of potential -1.43 pts)
- Urinary Continence: Continent (reference) (0.00 of potential -2.34 pts)
- Bowel Continence: Continent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.07 pts)
- Tube / IV / Parenteral Feed (0.00 of potential -1.05 pts)
- Mechanically Altered Diet (0.00 of potential -0.78 pts)
- High BMI (0.00 of potential -1.86 pts)
- Low BMI (0.00 of potential -0.33 pts)
- No PT/OT During Stay (0.00 of potential -3.09 pts)
Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.
Robert has dementia and mental health conditions, both of which reduce the expectation modestly.
- Dementia (HCC51 / HCC52) (-1.00 pts)
- Mental Health Disorders (HCC57–60) (-0.15 pts)
View 17 inactive covariates in this category
- Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
- Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
- Lymphoma & Other Cancers (HCC10) (0.00 of potential -0.86 pts)
- Colorectal / Bladder Cancer (HCC11) (0.00 of potential -0.03 pts)
- Diabetes (HCC18 / HCC19) (0.00 of potential -0.12 pts)
- Other Endocrine / Metabolic Disorders (HCC23) (0.00 of potential +0.06 pts)
- Intestinal Obstruction / Perforation (HCC33) (0.00 of potential +0.51 pts)
- Tetraplegia (partial) / Paraplegia (HCC70 / HCC71) (0.00 of potential -2.22 pts)
- Multiple Sclerosis (HCC77) (0.00 of potential -1.11 pts)
- Parkinson's & Huntington's Diseases (HCC78) (0.00 of potential -0.50 pts)
- Angina Pectoris (HCC88) (0.00 of potential -0.01 pts)
- Hemiplegia / Hemiparesis (HCC103) (0.00 of potential -1.80 pts)
- Aspiration / Bacterial Pneumonia (HCC114 / HCC115) (0.00 of potential +0.13 pts)
- Dialysis / CKD Stage 5 (HCC134 / HCC136) (0.00 of potential -1.51 pts)
- CKD Stages 1–4 (HCC137–HCC139) (0.00 of potential -0.20 pts)
- Major Head Injury (HCC167) (0.00 of potential -0.34 pts)
- Amputations (HCC173 / HCC189) (0.00 of potential +0.46 pts)
Robert's strong fracture starting point carries most of his expected discharge score. From there, his pre-admission profile makes a small downward adjustment, his history of falls actually adds a touch back, and dementia plus mental health conditions subtract a bit more. None of these dominate, but together they refine the strong baseline.
This is a strong-start pattern with modest, distributed adjustments: the diagnostic baseline carries most of the explanation, but several smaller factors collectively shape the final expectation.
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.
Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis
What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?
CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.
Pre-Admission Profile
How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?
Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. Residents who needed significant help with mobility or relied on assistive devices are unlikely to become fully independent during a short SNF stay, while those who were more independent may have greater recovery potential depending on diagnosis.
Clinical Factors & Comorbidities
What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?
This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.
Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and day-to-day progress.
Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.