Expected Discharge Score

Every resident has a story, and the expected discharge score reflects one way CMS understands that story. Choose a resident below to see how their starting point, prior level, and current reality shape the model's prediction.

Choose a resident

Margaret's Story

Margaret is the baseline case the model is built around.

Starting Point A common orthopedic case on a well-understood recovery path. +28.2 pts

Prior Level Used a walker and needed some assistance before admission. 0.0 pts

Current Reality No active clinical factors and no coded comorbidities. 0.0 pts

Admission Score
15
Where they start
Expected Gain
+28.2
Points over stay
Expected Score
43.2
CMS target at discharge
ADM
EXP
10 · Dependent 60 · Independent
Pattern

starting-point dominant — the baseline carries the score.

Starting Point

Admission Score & Primary Diagnosis

What is the typical recovery for residents with this admission function and diagnosis?

Admission → predicted discharge
Admitted
15
Predicted
43.2
10 · Dependent 60 · Independent

CMS looks at large groups of residents with the same diagnosis and similar admission function and identifies where those residents typically end up by discharge. That typical outcome becomes the starting estimated discharge score.

Margaret's admission score combined with her primary diagnosis of Hip & Knee Replacement sets her starting estimated discharge score.

This reflects where similar residents tend to land. It is the typical outcome for this type of case before anything unique about Margaret is considered.

  • Model Intercept (+29.08 pts)
  • Baseline Admission Lift (+16.25 pts)
  • Diminishing Returns (-2.14 pts)
  • Hip & Knee Replacement (reference) (+0.00 pts)
  • Admission × Diagnosis Interaction (+0.00 pts)
Prior Level

Pre-Admission Profile

How does this resident's prior function change what recovery is realistically expected?

Layer adjustment
+0.0 pts
0 Max possible: −13.7 pts

Before the event that led to hospitalization, a resident's level of independence helps shape what recovery is realistically expected. Residents who needed significant help with mobility or relied on assistive devices are unlikely to become fully independent during a short SNF stay, while those who were more independent may have greater recovery potential depending on diagnosis.

In Margaret's case, her pre-admission profile barely moves the needle. Prior surgery, walker use, and prior stair assistance each contribute small positive adjustments, while needing some help with mobility before admission contributes a small negative one — together, they roughly cancel out.

  • Age: 65–74 years (reference) (+0.00 pts)
  • Prior Surgery (+0.65 pts)
  • Prior Indoor Mobility: Some Help (-1.08 pts)
  • Prior Stairs: Some Help (+0.34 pts)
  • Mobility Device: Walker (+0.11 pts)
View 5 inactive covariates in this category
  • Prior Self-Care: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -4.03 pts)
  • Prior Functional Cognition: Independent (reference) (0.00 of potential -0.93 pts)
  • Mobility Device: Manual/Motorized Wheelchair or Scooter (0.00 of potential -2.57 pts)
  • Mobility Device: Mechanical Lift (0.00 of potential -2.82 pts)
  • Mobility Device: Orthotics/Prosthetics (0.00 of potential +0.03 pts)
Current Reality

Clinical Factors & Comorbidities

What factors are shaping recovery during this stay?

Combined adjustment
+0.0 pts
0 Max possible: −31.0 pts

This section reflects what is true at admission and throughout the stay. It includes both active clinical factors and additional coded conditions that CMS includes when estimating recovery.

Clinical Factors
+0.0 pts

Clinical factors reflect what is happening right now and how it affects therapy and day-to-day progress.

Margaret has no active clinical flags at admission.

  • Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (0.00 of potential -1.02 pts)
  • Stage 3/4/Unstageable PU (0.00 of potential -2.10 pts)
Comorbidities
+0.0 pts

Comorbidities capture additional coded conditions CMS includes in the estimate. These should be active, supported conditions—not merely historical diagnoses on a problem list.

Margaret has no HCC-coded comorbidities.

  • Septicemia / SIRS / Shock (HCC2) (0.00 of potential +0.20 pts)
  • Metastatic Cancer / Acute Leukemia (HCC8) (0.00 of potential -0.59 pts)
Summary
Admission 15
Expected Gain +28.2
Expected 43.2

CMS expects Margaret's discharge score to be carried almost entirely by where she starts. Her admission score and orthopedic diagnosis place her on a recovery path with strong typical outcomes, and her pre-admission profile is essentially neutral — prior surgery, walker use, and prior stair assistance offset her mild prior mobility limitation. With no active clinical concerns and no coded comorbidities, the model has nothing else to add or subtract.

This is a starting-point dominant pattern: the headline number is the diagnostic baseline, and the rest of the model confirms there's nothing meaningful in the way.

Source: SNF QRP Measure Calculations & Reporting User's Manual V5.0 · Table RA-9, Update ID 3
For educational purposes. Coefficient values rounded to 4 decimal places per CMS specification.
Download CSV
Admission 15
Expected Gain +28.2
Expected 43.2